Crime in adulthood is a well-established long-term consequence of childhood adversity, but the exact mechanism underlying this process is not well known. One mechanism suggested by research is that childhood adversity results in impaired neurobiology, emotional and executive functioning, and self-regulation. Disrupted emotional processing is linked to behavioural problems such as conduct disorders due to an impaired ability to recognise certain emotions, namely anger and fear, with the latter being linked to increased violence. Impaired executive functioning is hypothesized to lead to decreased inhibitory control and cognitive flexibility, while disrupted self-regulation is linked to increased aggressiveness due to an inability to regulate one’s thoughts, actions, and emotions. These deficiencies and their outcomes have been linked to crime, especially violent crime. However, other factors such as genetics, socioeconomic status and alcohol use can increase the likelihood of experiencing additional adversity while also influencing the nature and extent of these impairments. The resulting differences in cognitive and emotional impairments may result in different types of crimes being committed. We hope that better understanding of the processes mediating adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) in children and crime in adulthood can inform more precise therapy employed by clinicians treating these ACEs, as well as more cost-effective measures for policymakers to target the effects of these ACEs in vulnerable populations.